On Jun 5, 2011, at 4:24 PM, Niall Pemberton wrote: > > It could be argued either way. I am sure if IBM put its efforts to > LibreOffice then I'm sure it would be a great success. So why doesn't > IBM want to take part when theres a great FOSS community already in > existence?
Did you not read my post in reply to you an hour ago? The answer is obvious. IBM is not an "Open Source" company but a proprietary software company. Those are two separate business models. That is like asking Microsoft why you can't have the source code for Windows. Expecting a Leopard to change into a Lion is simply not going to happen - at least not quickly. Ralph --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
