Hi Kevin,

I made a couple of minor edits.

A few more suggestions...

I think you could drop the last sentence of the rationale. The ASF doesn't have 
any strategic goals to cover particular technology areas.

Th alignment section looks fine as is, but it's not strictly necessary to 
speculate on other projects you might use. There's no requirement to depend on 
other ASF projects instead of other suitable choices.

The addition of the dependency and license tables is informative, but I'd leave 
the actions and remarks for a status page later - as others have said these 
problems can be resolved in incubation.

On that note though - I believe java mail and the server API are available 
under compatible licenses.

You've mentioned there are original contributors now less involved in the code. 
Are they likely to still be involved in other activities that are part of the 
decision making of the project?

Thanks,
Brett

On 05/04/2012, at 4:03 PM, Kevin Kluge <kevin.kl...@citrix.com> wrote:

> I updated the proposal at 
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/CloudStackProposal.   I have included the 
> embedded source dependencies, binary dependencies, and contributor e-mail 
> addresses.  There are some open questions in the dependencies (e.g., 
> treatment of dependencies that have no discernible license), but my 
> impression is that these issues do not need resolution before entering 
> incubation.  Please correct me if that's wrong.
> 
> I believe the proposal is now complete, pending additional feedback.
> 
> -kevin
> 
> 
> B�KKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKCB��[��X��ܚX�KK[XZ[��[�\�[][��X��ܚX�P[��X�]܋�\X�K�ܙ�B��܈Y][ۘ[��[X[��K[XZ[��[�\�[Z[[��X�]܋�\X�K�ܙ�B

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Reply via email to