Hi, On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 9:02 PM, Christian Grobmeier <grobme...@gmail.com> wrote: > ...We also have 172 IPMC members to date (according committer index). > Most of the people are not seen often; we have many awol mentors. > Currently becoming an IPMC member is necessary to become a Mentor. It > always felt wrong to me. I think one should be able to become a Mentor > and finally be able to join the IPMC and discuss rules, when he has > shown merit....
The problem is that people must be members of the Incubator PMC to vote on releases. I don't have a problem with having 172 members on this PMC, it is clear that many of them are not currently active and that's fine. >...I am proposing now to reconsider Joes > original proposal and change our community voting to a majority voting > unless we restructure the IPMC.... What does that mean exactly? That we consider -1s in votes on IPMC membership to be just a -1 on a majority vote, as opposed to a veto? I'm in favor of that, and I don't think we need more rules. -Bertrand --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
