On 26 March 2014 00:23, James Taylor <jamestay...@apache.org> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 5:07 PM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> HBase is ASF code surely? >> So why does it need mentioning? - unless its NOTICE file has some >> attributions that relate to what you are bundling >> > > Yes, HBase is ASF code. The other stuff we've listed are the transitive > dependencies of HBase. Do we list then only the non ASF transitive > dependencies in our LICENSE file? I think I was confused by the > http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#deps-of-deps instructions.
What is confusing about that? If it is not clear, how could it be made clearer? > Would it be ok if I attached a modified LICENSE file for review here? Please don't include the full license text. Just include what you propose to append to the standard AL 2.0 file. > Our > NOTICE file will be modified to include only the bare minimum as described > here: http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#simple That's fine provided that there are no requirements for attribution, . Remember also that the NOTICE (and LICENSE) files relate to the "bits that are bundled" so may be different for source and binary releases. > Thanks, > James --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
