Thanks Justin. We had read that document, but even reading the "binary section", it wasn't clear that source and binary L&N had to be different. I would suggest to update the page to make it clear that "These additional dependencies must be accounted for in LICENSE and NOTICE." doesn't mean that the LICENSE and NOTICE files need to be updated to include those additional dependencies, but that *separate* L&N files *must* be issued including these additional dependencies.
2015-07-17 1:02 GMT+02:00 Justin Mclean <justinmcl...@me.com>: > Hi, > >> +1 ! And adding such a tool into rat or whatever would be extremely >> helpful, too... > > The “tools” I use generally make a bit of noise and require some > interpretation / filtering so I’m not sure they could be automated cleanly. > One thing rat might be able to do that I don’t think it currently does is > detect files containing more than one license header. > > Best advice I can give is follow this guide [1] and use it when reviewing > releases. > > Thanks, > Justin > > 1. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
