On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 6:46 AM, Shane Curcuru <a...@shanecurcuru.org> wrote:
> (note mixed private/public lists)
> General questions, since... we haven't actually had any discussion yet.
> - Is there a particular hurry to bring this to pTLP faster than the
> traditional general@incubator discussion period is?
Didn't realize there were rules about TLPs needing to drop by the
Incubator. Or that timelines were required.
Seems this is simply a TLP resolution proposed to the Board, and the
Incubator has zero input or concern on what DRAT is asking from the Board.
> - Has the Apache Creadur project been consulted about the new project
> proposal, and in particular do they have any comments on using DRAT as
> the name, which subsumes their popular Rat name?
These are not the same communities. The Foundation should not "force" them
to work together.
They might logically make sense together, but the *communities* are
disjoint. There is zero reason for those communities to be lumped together.
In fact, it was the disjoint communities under an umbrella project that
spearheaded the Foundation's "blow up umbrellas" campaign a decade ago.
Communities define groupings. Not topic.
And does the DRAT acronym really impose on what the Creadur people are
doing with their Rat tool? Meh. That's a stretch.