Hi Roman
> From a peanut gallery: has the podling considered PMC == committers at > the graduation point? > The two lists look very close to each other. Good suggestion. I have started a discussion[1] in skywalking private. I will feedback the conclusion later. [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/077eea102d7b678ae8dc22c46019fd88b0d7e1d839e523c3595071f9@%3Cprivate.skywalking.apache.org%3E ------------------ Sheng Wu Apache SkyWalking, ShardingSphere, Zipkin Twitter, wusheng1108 ------------------ Original ------------------ From: "roman"<[email protected]>; Date: Tue, Mar 5, 2019 12:49 PM To: "general"<[email protected]>; Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache SkyWalking (incubating) as a TLP(take2) On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 12:42 PM Craig Russell <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > On Mar 4, 2019, at 3:12 AM, Mick Semb Wever <[email protected]> wrote: > >> The cookies in the moderator mails expire after a few days. > > > > This example was all done today. Numerous attempts have been made. > >> It also means that the person is aware that the private@ list is > >> something they need to follow. > > > As noted else-thread, there is an alternate method to subscribing to the > email lists, by sending email to > [email protected] > > > Not getting any response at all is not an indication of whether the list > > exist of not, unfortunately. > > > > Anyway?? to the thread's discussion: every PPMC received an invitation (per > > Apache template) that requested subscription to both dev and private ML. > > Reading the ASF guidelines here: > > https://apache.org/foundation/governance/pmcs.html#communication ; I > > interpret it as they SHOULD be subscribed rather than MUST, and I'm curious > > as to whether how many of the TLPs are actually enforcing this among their > > pmc, if any. It's an interesting discussion?? but I'm not entirely > > convinced it's an accurate shortcoming to whether the podling is ready for > > graduation or not. > > I think the question is not "Is SkyWalking ready to graduate" but "Is the > proposed PMC list accurate". > > The PMC members are responsible for governing the TLP and as such need to be > familiar with what is expected of them. Governance activities are conducted > on the PPMC private list. If a PPMC member has not participated in any > governance activities during incubation, it's unclear that they belong on the > PMC. > > Reviewing the last several months of private@skywalking list, most of the > discussion of new committers has had only four or five participants, who are > clearly involved in governance of the project. From a peanut gallery: has the podling considered PMC == committers at the graduation point? The two lists look very close to each other. Thanks, Roman. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
