Hi - > On Mar 5, 2019, at 3:55 PM, 吴晟 Sheng Wu <wu.sh...@foxmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Roman > > > In the discussion, I started about inviting committers to PMC when > graduation, shows the most PPMC members support this. We will wait another 2 > days, in case someone may say others. > > > In case PPMC agree, I want to ask the process steps of this. From committer > to PMC, I think each one should be invited and accept to be one. Then, when > should the invitation happens? > Do we need to send invitation and get confirmation before change the > graduation PMC list? > Or we could change the PMC list first, after our graduation proposal is > accepted, we send the invitation.
Just put them all on the graduation proposal (the IPMC and board’s approval is equal to NOTICE) and (unless Infra does it) add them to the PMC in Whimsy once you have graduated and infrastructure has moved the project LDAP. Regards, Dave > > > Thanks. > > > > Sheng Wu > Apache SkyWalking, ShardingSphere, Zipkin > > From Wu Sheng 's phone. > > > ------------------ Original ------------------ > From: roman <ro...@shaposhnik.org> > Date: Tue,Mar 5,2019 0:50 PM > To: general <general@incubator.apache.org> > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache SkyWalking (incubating) as a TLP(take2) > > > > On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 12:42 PM Craig Russell <apache....@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >>> On Mar 4, 2019, at 3:12 AM, Mick Semb Wever <m...@apache.org> wrote: >>>> The cookies in the moderator mails expire after a few days. >>> >>> This example was all done today. Numerous attempts have been made. >>>> It also means that the person is aware that the private@ list is >>>> something they need to follow. >>> >> As noted else-thread, there is an alternate method to subscribing to the >> email lists, by sending email to >> private-subscribe-EMAIL.ADDRESS=domain....@skywalking.apache.org >> >>> Not getting any response at all is not an indication of whether the list >>> exist of not, unfortunately. >>> >>> Anyway… to the thread's discussion: every PPMC received an invitation (per >>> Apache template) that requested subscription to both dev and private ML. >>> Reading the ASF guidelines here: >>> https://apache.org/foundation/governance/pmcs.html#communication ; I >>> interpret it as they SHOULD be subscribed rather than MUST, and I'm curious >>> as to whether how many of the TLPs are actually enforcing this among their >>> pmc, if any. It's an interesting discussion… but I'm not entirely convinced >>> it's an accurate shortcoming to whether the podling is ready for graduation >>> or not. >> >> I think the question is not "Is SkyWalking ready to graduate" but "Is the >> proposed PMC list accurate". >> >> The PMC members are responsible for governing the TLP and as such need to be >> familiar with what is expected of them. Governance activities are conducted >> on the PPMC private list. If a PPMC member has not participated in any >> governance activities during incubation, it's unclear that they belong on >> the PMC. >> >> Reviewing the last several months of private@skywalking list, most of the >> discussion of new committers has had only four or five participants, who are >> clearly involved in governance of the project. > > From a peanut gallery: has the podling considered PMC == committers at > the graduation point? > The two lists look very close to each other. > > Thanks, > Roman. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
