Peter Donald wrote:
>
> I have another theory ;) Reuse occurs vertically not
> horizontally. For instance Cocoon reuses a lot of Avalon
> code and when a bit of code reaches a certain "generality"
> threshold in C2 it is bubbled back into Avalon (ie
> DataSource pools just did so recently). I assume the same
> thing occurs with Turbine-Jetspeed (didn't some of
> Jetspeeds security/user-management bubble back ???).
Good point.
Now for the $50,000 question: Which is "higher": Avalon or Turbine?
I see both as competing for the title of "bottom".
It would be a darn shame for each component in the system to continue to
have its own pool of JDBC connections at runtime.
Struts is a potential customer. There is an interesting dynamic that is
available for somebody to exploit: the reusable framework with the most
customers tends to attract more customers.
- Sam Ruby
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
