Peter Donald wrote: > > In short it is not the responsibility of the PMC to accept or not > accept dual licensing. It is a responsibility of the apache members > foundation-wide (as they are the copyright owners). The ASF board would expect the PMCs to work licensing issues. > I suspect that this wouldn't occur although I hope that the next > version of APL and next version of GPL could be interoperable. IANAL, nor do I play one on TV. But I have seen quite a few good people try to resolve what appears on the surface to be a deceptively simply issue, and fail. Significant attempts have been made, but each time objections have been addressed, new ones have been raised. - Sam Ruby --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: Test Infrastructure Project Proposal Ceki Gülcü
- Re: Test Infrastructure Project Proposal Peter Donald
- Re: Test Infrastructure Project Proposal Ceki Gülcü
- Re: Test Infrastructure Project Proposal Alex Fernández
- Re: Test Infrastructure Project Proposal Kevin A. Burton
- Re: Test Infrastructure Project Proposal Alex Fernández
- Re: Test Infrastructure Project Proposal Kevin A. Burton
- Re: Test Infrastructure Project Proposal Alex Fernández
- Re: Test Infrastructure Project Proposal Peter Donald
- Re: Test Infrastructure Project Proposal Kevin A. Burton
- Re: Test Infrastructure Project Proposal Sam Ruby
- Re: Test Infrastructure Project Proposal Peter Donald
- Re: Test Infrastructure Project Proposal Kevin A. Burton
- Re: Test Infrastructure Project Proposal Sam Ruby
- Re: Test Infrastructure Project Proposal Kevin A. Burton
- Re: Test Infrastructure Project Proposal Peter Donald
- Re: Test Infrastructure Project Proposal Peter Donald
- Re: Test Infrastructure Project Proposal Sam Ruby
- Re: Test Infrastructure Project Proposal Sam Ruby
- Re: Test Infrastructure Project Proposal Sam Ruby
- Re: Test Infrastructure Project Proposal Peter Donald