To be more exact. I'm talking about that which is included in the code. Just
curious why some projects have a long version (the whole license) while
others have a nice short version (pointer to the license). I'm not a
contributor to any of the apache projects so I don't have much right to
complain, but from a user experience, I find the documentation on most
projects fall short and to understand how to use the project, I have to read
the code. For me, it is easier to browse log4j code than it is ORO code due
to the long license. It is not that big of a deal, but IMHO it would be nice
if all the project used the short version.
-david
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jon Stevens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2001 9:57 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] The Commons
>
>
> on 3/9/01 1:15 PM, "David Duddleston" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Just another rant.... Even after a few years, it still bugs me
> that license
> > and copyright mark on each piece of Apache code is so darn
> long. Even a dog
> > knows it only takes a few drops to marks its territory.
> >
> > -david
>
> Tell that to the lawyers.
>
> -jon
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
