Alex Fernández wrote:
>
> Jon Stevens wrote:
>
> > I can't wait to see what it will be like to configure all these Commons
> > components and how many .xml files I will have to edit or how much
> > configuration code I will have to write to make it work...
>
> You're right, of course. If instead of integrating a whole framework we
> have to configure 100 components so the pool has trace, XML, task
> scheduling, web-admin and whatever capabilities, it isn't what we need.
>
> In fact, if the component configuration cannot be integrated in our
> global configuration scheme, it will not do.
>
> So, in a word, we don't need components that integrate with each other;
> we need components that need no integration at all. Perhaps we would be
> better off with a framework; but that's not what we think.
My better judgement tells me to dare not suggest how getting a common
configuration pattern for the components might be realized, as I am sure
it will bring howls of derision and scorn regarding central control and
big brother.
However, this is a really good point and a discussion we should have in
Commons-land. Please come and join if interested.
geir
--
Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Developing for the web? See http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
