On Tue, 1 Jan 2002, Ted Husted wrote:
> Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2002 14:54:30 -0500
> From: Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: Jakarta General List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Jakarta General List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Just the JARs
>
> "Geir Magnusson Jr." wrote:
> > Putting aside *all* the stuff we are talking about for a moement, and
> > looking at the simple notion of just having release jars available w/o docs,
> > source, etc I don't think this is a bad idea :)
> >
> > However....
> >
> > Any license issues? Wouldn't we want to package the jar w/ a license ?
>
> This simple notion -- and my putting together a Jakarta release HOWTO --
> is why I opened this particular thread.
>
> The license issue is well taken. I think it would be a good practice for
> us to include a license in all of our JARs. Even when we don't
> distribute them seperately ourselves, they are intended to be
> distributed seperately by our licensees. Point noted.
>
How about including a copy of the "LICENSE" file in the META-INF
subdirectory of each JAR file produced by an Apache project?
> -Ted.
Craig
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
