[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > It [gcj] had some minor issues ( required few changes, inner classes are > tricky even for jikes ), and few bugs in class loading - but I was > able to get everything working.
Yes, it can be annoying to get things working. I think it's partly incomplete implementation of features in gcj, and partly that Java projects are written primarily for conventional JREs. > The good/bad news - it's was as fast as IBM JDK1.3 on linux > ( which is the fastest - on my setup ). Beeing as fast as > the fastest is usually good news, but I was hoping a bit more :-) Rumour has it that gcc 3.1 will be substantially better. I am not involved enough to know how true this is, but I think a lot of Java specific optimisations didn't get done until after the 3.0.x branch. -- Pete -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
