I've no problem with that if Ken is given committer access, the community agrees and comes up with a plan to integrate the two and all. I just figured it made more sense to have a project specifically for it rather than a subproject of a subproject that has nothing to do with it in general. But there has to be a sincere effort not just a "squash centipede by saying yes to the proposal then -1ing the implemnetation". We need the features of Centipede and I really don't want to go through the pain of maturing Maven's implementation of those. If the two work together its virtually irrelevant to me WHERE. I just want the "to".
Personally I'd like to see the combined Centaven moved to a jakarta.org/centaven level. If this effort is truely undertaken, POI will upgrade to a combined centaven. (I don't care what its named its the senitment).. . Then who wins? Well everyone. We get what we need. (and POI is turning out to be a pretty successful Jakarta project -- we've even influenced some folks over to the bright side of the force -- opensource the apache way -- who might not have been otherwise! Even if we're cast the rebels inside the rebel group. And I think most of us have even learned to enjoy your posts Jon.) -Andy Jon Scott Stevens wrote: >on 5/1/02 5:30 AM, "Andrew C. Oliver" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>So why not push Maven into Centipede? Whats the rationalization for the >>competition? Ken can you give a few of the Maven guys CVS access and >>Maven guys. Can you all work together? I've not seen a compelling >>different approach. The seperation seems to be ego-based so says me. >> > >How abou the other way around? Push Centipede into Maven? > >(for the same reasons why POI came over to Jakarta) > >-jon > > >-- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
