on 5/2/02 7:42 PM, "Sam Ruby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > but there must have been a reason why a different DTD was > chosen than Gump's. I made an effort to document the Gump data definitions > and there certainly is plenty of instance data to look at. Tell me what to > change, tell me what's wrong, or simply tell me they suck. All I ask is > that you don't continue to ignore this work.
Isn't XSLT all about transformations from one DTD to another? What is the big deal about having different DTD's? -jon -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
