> I got proven wrong from the > point of view > that enough people wanted T3 to survive. I got proven right that T3 > distracted a limited set of resources (ie: people) from T4.
Uau! You already got HALF way. You just still don't understand that T4 probably has more resources thanks to T3 staying at Jakarta - with the collaboration that is going on. If T3 had been banned from Jakarta, maybe most of those that are collaborating would have gone elsewhere with T3. Have fun, Paulo > -----Original Message----- > From: Jon Scott Stevens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 10:21 PM > > on 5/2/02 12:23 PM, "GOMEZ Henri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> Costin, just like with Tomcat 3 vs. Tomcat 4. We all learned > >> that you can't > >> force projects to work together. Nor can you vote -1 on it. Given our > >> history, I'm really surprised to hear you trying to argue for > >> something like > >> that. You hypocrite. > > > > Again and again, the same bullshits. > > > > Jon, take a closer look into tomcat-dev and you'll see that > > projects could works together, using others ways in JTC, > > coyote, jk/jk2, are the proof that tomcat developpers from > > 4.x and 3.3.x could works together... > > Sure, the developers are working together on *some* stuff, but the core > products they are not and my original Tomcat arguments were that > it was lame > to have two different containers. I got proven wrong from the > point of view > that enough people wanted T3 to survive. I got proven right that T3 > distracted a limited set of resources (ie: people) from T4. > > Centipede is to Tomcat 3 as Maven is to Tomcat 4. > > You can't force the developers of T3 to work on T4. > > -jon -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
