Marc Fluery is (or, at least, comes across as) a jerk with some good ideas.
Unlike most folks who have used Tapestry, he didn't ask for clarifications
or make suggestions or enter into a dialog ... he made demands.  When I
asked that he actually participate, he dropped off the list. He's definately
more of a hacker, really doesn't like the basic discipline of declaring
things before using them, type safety, etc.

I don't always javadoc accessor methods without side effects.  I don't
javadoc methods in implementations that are fully described in the
interface's javadoc.  If you look at the online Javadoc, not the code
comments, it's pretty darn complete.  I have a weak memory, so I always
comment as I go (or even comment first).

I wouldn't call the site ugly, and the docs *are* online, as HTML, PDF,
JavaDoc ... even the code coverage report (which includes source code).
There's a "Documentation" tab on the main frame.

I haven't worked for Primix in over a year.  Primix doesn't exist, they got
bought out by a bigger fish, BurntSand.  I believe they mostly do Windows
stuff, with some ATG thrown in.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Andrew C. Oliver" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jakarta General List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, October 20, 2002 10:53 AM
Subject: Evaluation Re: [PROPOSAL] Tapestry joins Jakarta


> So Tapestry seems to have attracted a healthy following and the
> attention of such notables as Marc Fleury (Whom I think is a technically
> proficient and thoroughly decent okay guy...and he likes altoids more
> than I do):
>
>
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=1165034&forum_id=7644
>
> There is even potential synergy with another Jakarta project ;-):
>
>
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=1142661&forum_id=7644
>
> Oh and they already use stuff from jakarta-commons (as opposed to
> apache-commons which is confusing ;-) )
>
> The project is pretty active:
>
> http://sourceforge.net/project/stats/index.php?report=months&group_id=4754
>
> There is the inevitable book deal that seems to be all the rage these
> days:
>
> http://tapestry.sourceforge.net/wiki_frame.html
>
> Hey I think I know that Christian Hall guy from somewhere ;-):
>
> http://tapestry.sourceforge.net/wiki_frame.html
>
> I like the code okay, it has Javadoc...  There are some methods that
> probably should be javadoc'd but aren't....
>
>
http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/tapestry/Tapestry/framework/s
rc/net/sf/tapestry/AbstractPage.java?rev=1.8&content-type=text/vnd.viewcvs-m
arkup
>
> Their website is ugly and doesn't have their docs directly online:
>
> tapestry.sourceforge.net
>
> Notes:
>
> 1. I didn't actually try and run it, i just looked at all the available
> online information.. (Sorry, don't have time to run it, I'm assuming
> user testimony is enough)
>
> Concerns:
>
> Tapestry started out as Primix foundation..  Is Howard still employed by
> Primix... would he still be working on it if he was no longer?
>
> Tapestry appears to have decent documentation...  Do we allow that
> around here? ;-)
>
> My biggest concern is they want to start following the "Apache way"
> after moving here.  In my opinion they have enough contributors, etc.
> I'd like to see them start voting and the such first, then reevaluate
> once they've been doing it a few months.  They might also want to
> investigate a home at JBoss if Apache doesn't work out.  I know those
> guys are expanding.
>
> All in all, as much as I don't really care for PULL methods...  This
> seems to be a healthy community, it seems to be reasonably well in line
> with Jakarta, and I think it would be a good fit.
>
> So for whats its worth +0 from me, and +1 if they start following the
> voting rules/etc in advance then move here.
>
> If they do that I will volunteer to help them out with bringing them
> into the fold and all, although I'm not a member.
>
> -Andy
>
> On Sun, 2002-10-20 at 09:35, Howard M. Lewis Ship wrote:
> > I don't have a way to qualify this, but I'm very concerned about growing
the
> > community, and therefore I'm very careful not to be arbitrary.
Everything
> > is a discussion, and I prefer that person X be happy with the ultimate
> > decision, preferably agreeing with it.
> >
> > I've tried to before to spur more organization, but that didn't really
get
> > started.  The problem is, developers are too happy, I think.  The
framework
> > does mostly what they need, bugs fixes and improvements happen, so there
> > hasn't been a need to get involved.  A move to Jakarta will *force* a
few
> > people (and I know who they are) to step forward, since other wise, by
the
> > rules, nothing will actually happen.
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Peter Donald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "Jakarta General List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Saturday, October 19, 2002 9:04 PM
> > Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Tapestry joins Jakarta
> >
> >
> > On Sun, 20 Oct 2002 02:06, Howard M. Lewis Ship wrote:
> > > "Benevolent dictatorship".  Probably should have expanded on this.
> > Without
> > > a formal comittee or voting system, I've reserved the right to
ultimately
> > > decide what goes into the framework and what doesn't.
> >
> > Start changing now. I don't know how long it will be before you come to
> > Apache
> > but there is no harm and considerable benefit in moving to this model
IMHO.
> > It would also enhance your chances of making it into Apache.
> >
> > --
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Peter Donald
> > --------------------------------------------------
> >  Logic: The art of being wrong with confidence...
> > --------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
<mailto:general-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org>
> > For additional commands, e-mail:
<mailto:general-help@;jakarta.apache.org>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
<mailto:general-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org>
> > For additional commands, e-mail:
<mailto:general-help@;jakarta.apache.org>
> >
> --
> http://www.superlinksoftware.com - software solutions for business
> http://jakarta.apache.org/poi - Excel/Word/OLE 2 Compound Document in
> Java
> http://krysalis.sourceforge.net/centipede - the best build/project
> structure
>     a guy/gal could have! - Make Ant simple on complex Projects!
> The avalanche has already started. It is too late for the pebbles to
> vote.
> -Ambassador Kosh
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:general-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:general-help@;jakarta.apache.org>
>
>


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:general-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:general-help@;jakarta.apache.org>

Reply via email to