Costin Manolache wrote:
Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
(...)

wow...  :-(

I don't know what "wow" means - but it is absolutely normal for any
community. I'm sure there are people who don't like working with me ( or
anyone else )- and the reverse. I don't think anyone can reasonably expect anything else.
+1

What's important is for everyone to keep having some fun and decide for
himself if beeing in a community like jakarta ( and benefiting from the
diversity of opinions and ideas - even from people we don't like ) is worth
the effort of dealing with the people we don't like ( or strongly disagree
with, or both ).

There is a positive aspect to this, and it starts when (project) frontiers are established between non-working-together (but respectful) teams. These frontiers are likely to evolve into APIs and products that are strictly controlled for compliancy (I would say fiercly ;-) and this is A Good Thing.

But the premise is having the parties to agree in the frontiers, i.e. having clear concerns for subprojects, modularising the essential parts and competing with the rest of it.

I mean, we're not as Microsoft, breaking compatibility for the sake of it.

I think such a scenario is one of the best possible ones, provided that the heat does not make things explode.

Just my two cents,
Santiago


As ( and if ) jakarta becomes a single community - everyone will have to deal with this decision.

Costin


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to