Jason van Zyl wrote:
Ack. For all I remember, I may have even helped setting them up. I don't want to specifically address point by point the parts of this email I have snipped, but I have no problem with duplication of effort - but I have to note that this goes both ways.BTW, for the record, was the creation of the jakarta-turbine-maven resources (CVS and lists) approved by this PMC?Yes, they were. The creation of the lists didn't get by Sam. It was Costin who argued that each project should be allowed to do what it likes.
Maven, Ruper, and Gump target similar goals. They have different implementations and the merits (pluses AND minuses) of each can be debated.
Spreading them out across separate projects simply because some people don't want to work with one another is not right.
Jason, now let me ask you a direct question: if you don't want to work with the Apache infrastructure and can't or won't comply with Apache policies, then why do you want Maven to be an Apache project?
- Sam Ruby
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
