On 3/16/06, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: <snip/> > Nah, we're into a realm where legitimacy is defined by whatever we decide > to do. Technically our charter says we need a 75% of the PMC vote to > remove someone - we're not going to get that and it's not a rule that > scopes. > > We probably should just drop that from the charter - it's unnecessary > bureaucracy. Or change it to something simpler. One question is whether > we'd want to do that first - before removing the inactive PMC members from > the PMC.
no, we should just change it to a 75% majority needed to remove an *active* PMC member. though i wasn't there when it was written, i'd put good money down that that was the original intent. i'm sure the 75% rule is for removing abusers, not for dropping inactive members from the roles. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
