On 3/16/06, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Previously I'd suggested that we should be cleaning up inactive committers
> and inactive PMC members - because I'm a bit of a tidy-addict sometimes
> and I enjoy deleting :)
>
> A thread on [EMAIL PROTECTED] convinced me that this was half wrong though
> - we shouldn't be worrying about cleaning up the large list of inactive
> committers, they might come back and that would be great.
>
> However I do still think we should be cleaning up the inactive PMC
> members. The PMC represents the active committers entrusted with oversight
> - so to have inactive committers on there is a detriment to its ability to
> get the job done.


I think I know what you mean, but if I'm right, you didn't say what you
mean. ;-)

The PMC represents those people entrusted with oversight of the project. The
manner in which we elect PMC members means that those people are committers.
A PMC member may be active or inactive with respect to committership, and
may be active or inactive with respect to oversight of the project. Those
two are not necessarily tied at any given time. For example, someone might
be actively working to ensure oversight of the project, but may not have
committed anything for a long time.

All that is a long-winded way of saying that it's not "inactive committers"
that are the concern, but rather inactive overseers. Those people are harder
to identify. Your SVN file proposal might help, although it's not a complete
solution. (I'm not sure that there is one, though.)

--
Martin Cooper


My proposal is that we create a file in SVN in which PMC members can list
> themselves as being active. After 1 month, failure to appear in that list
> will result in removal from the PMC. If it goes well we could consider
> doing it periodically, or just when it feels like the numbers are getting
> out of sync again.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Hen
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

Reply via email to