On Fri, 2006-03-17 at 10:48 -0500, Henri Yandell wrote: > > On Fri, 17 Mar 2006, Noel J. Bergman wrote: > > >> My proposal is that we create a file in SVN in which PMC members can list > >> themselves as being active. After 1 month, failure to appear in that list > >> will result in removal from the PMC. > > > > Why not just send out e-mail to the PMC members asking them if they want to > > remain active? > > Sounds good. Seems to fit with Sandy and Danny's preferences without being > too complex - just a chunk of email to send out. > > Can deal with those who've not replied and email addresses that bounce if > and when that happens.
+1 > Will do so if no one is against the idea in 10 days or so. > > > We have done this with another PMC, and had one person repeatedly ask to > > stay listed as active. I don't think that I've seen a post from him other > > than that in some years now, but as long as he's happy reading and has > > nothing to say, I have no problem with keeping him. > > > > There is no quorum to be met for the PMC. > > There is on the Jakarta PMC (informally due to our charter), but it's > something we should drop anyway. :) +1 is this a board thing or can we just vote to fix it now? i agree with noel we should aim for as few rules as possible :) in this spirit, i wonder whether we actually need to formally remove people from the committee (once the quorum issue is fixed). i agree that it's important to know which pmc'ers are still active to address oversight but this could be achieved without formally removing anyone from the pmc: just create a subsection on the website inside the pmc section for emeritus pmc'ers. in the case of those people who don't reply, move them to that subsection of the website but leave them on the legal committee. saves paperwork and means that there's no hassle reactivating. - robert --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
