Serge Knystautas wrote:
> Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> > We're part of a community that has QoS, lifespan and support
requirements.
> > The ASF doesn't host important things on non-ASF infrastructure.
Transient
> > toys, fine.
> You have a knack for saying your opinion as if this is the ASF's as a
> whole.
No, this is not *my* opinion, Serge.
> ASF code has to be hosted here. Website content unofficially has to be
> hosted here.
Wrong. OFFICIALLY *must* be here.
> Issue tracking is preferred to be hosted at the ASF.
Not true. Much more than "preferred."
> Some projects have had issue tracking hosted elsewhere until the ASF
> infrastructure was ready to handle it.
And been reprimanded for going off-site in the first place.
> A news/blog? Nobody has debated this point and ruled on it the way
> you claim.
Official project content is supposed to be on our infrastructure. Projects
that ran over to codehaus to use Confluence weren't looked at with favor,
either.
> [Hosting apps] is a very contentious debate. Some board members are
> writing more strongly worded arguments (on both sides)
I'll leave that discussion where it is, rather than repeat it on non-closed
lists.
--- Noel
