Noel J. Bergman ha scritto: > Serge Knystautas wrot: > >> my point is: > >> code HAS to be at ASF. > > +1 > >> 2. websites pretty much HAVE to be at the ASF > > +1 > >> but we still end up having docs or other things off of ASF stuff, >> at least temporarily. > > Should not happen. > >>> Official project content is supposed to be on our infrastructure. > Projects >>> that ran over to codehaus to use Confluence weren't looked at with > favor, >>> either. > >> I really encourage you to view official docs. The websites are an anon >> svn checkout. There is no documented statement of how the docs got there. > > Nor did I suggest otherwise. I am referring to projects that used > Confluence LIVE as their web site, not sites that use it as an editor, and > import generated static HTML into SVN. Perhaps you misunderstood me. > > --- Noel
Of course, when I proposed to ask for a Confluence Space I linked to http://cwiki.apache.org/CWIKI/ and the first rule is explained pretty well. A good example is IMHO the way mina solved this: http://mina.apache.org/ In their homepage they have statically exported also the news, and a link to http://feeds.feedburner.com/asf/mina as a feed source so to not use cwiki directly. But the original feed is that one. If one day ASF will provide a simple service to publish a cached RSS starting from confluence they will also remove the "feedburner" helper. If using feedburner scares someone, IMHO, it could be removed at all, and we could avoid at all publishing an RSS if this gets much more consensus (my impression is that RSS was not a primary goal for people that commented this thread). Stefano
