Noel J. Bergman wrote:
ASF code has to be hosted here. Website content unofficially has to be
hosted here.
Wrong. OFFICIALLY *must* be here.
Issue tracking is preferred to be hosted at the ASF.
Not true. Much more than "preferred."
I'm happy if you have a better word... my point is
1. code HAS to be at ASF. this is a complete non-starter
2. websites pretty much HAVE to be at the ASF, but we still end up
having docs or other things off of ASF stuff, at least temporarily.
3. issue tracking we try to accomodate and have done yeoman's work, but
it's getting there.
A news/blog? Nobody has debated this point and ruled on it the way
you claim.
Official project content is supposed to be on our infrastructure. Projects
that ran over to codehaus to use Confluence weren't looked at with favor,
either.
I really encourage you to view official docs. The websites are an anon
svn checkout. There is no documented statement of how the docs got there.
http://www.apache.org/dev/project-site.html
--
Serge Knystautas
Lokitech >> software . strategy . design >> http://www.lokitech.com
p. 301.656.5501
e. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
