Danny Angus wrote:
> Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> > As I understand it, the gist of it seems to be that we'd have a
generated
> > file based on our feed
> There are two steps in this...
> 1/ easy posting which results in a feed.
> 2/ use the feed
And those would address the primary goal, which you've expressed as:
> We are looking for a very simple way to post (and revise) content
> which can be viewed on the web (news archive) and syndicated
> without going through the lousy web-site update process.
and also wrote:
> it is a fact that news is the thing we should update most often
> and making news story easy to post would be a quick win, 80% of
> the benefit for very little effort.
and with which I very definitely agree.
> I'm +1 to using anything which Sam recommends, sight unseen,
> because he knows much more about this stuff than I ever will.
As I understand it, we tell Sam from where to fetch the news, and he
provides us with the syndicated page. Sam?
Sam, could you fetch from a defined location in SVN? That might satisfy the
desire to have editorial control that Danny, and particularly Stefano, raise
as a concern. We could stage the news articles in svn, move them to a
defined location when approved, and still have the ability to make
corrections. Or are changes not permitted once published? Even so, we
could address the review concerns.
--- Noel
