> You have a knack for saying your opinion as if this is the ASF's as a > whole. As a member of the accused community, I find that very frustrating. > > ASF code has to be hosted here. Website content unofficially has to be > hosted here. Issue tracking is preferred to be hosted at the ASF. Some > projects have had issue tracking hosted elsewhere until the ASF > infrastructure was ready to handle it.
All of the above 'officially' has to be hosted 'here'. The issue trackers are for the most part have all migrated to ASF machines now. While not a member of the JAMES project, I would also strongly vote -1 on using an external service, like Blogger, for hosting official content. The issue of dynamic content generation is being actively discussed on infrastructure lists, come join the discussion and help out, its our shared infrastructure, everyone is on the same team and trying to make things better. Thanks, -Paul
