Danny Angus wrote:
> Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> > you seem to be implying that the news items would be committed
> > without review, and then changed if necessary. I'm not
> > considering that to be a proper practice, even if we can change
> > them later.
> It may not be "proper practice" in your opinion but it is what we
> have always done
I seem to recall that at least initially, we did review on dev@ the
announcements that we would subsequently post to user@, until they basically
became boilerplate updates. That's what I'm talking about. Are we talking
about different things?
--- Noel
