On 8/20/07, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > you seem to be implying that the news items would be committed without > review, and then changed if necessary. I'm not considering that to be a > proper practice, even if we can change them later.
It may not be "proper practice" in your opinion but it is what we have always done, and put in perspective this is James project news, not stock prices or earthquake warnings. d.
