>   the rank of the verb determins the cells.

This is not correct.  For example, it make sense 
to talk about the 1-cells of a matrix (the rows
of a matrix) without reference to any verb.



----- Original Message -----
From: Dan Bron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Friday, September 22, 2006 10:10 am
Subject: Re: Cell (was Re: [Jgeneral] I expect a table of ordered pairs for 
this)

> Short answer:
> 
>   The rank of the noun determines the items,
>   the rank of the verb determins the cells.
> 
> Every noun can be thought of as a "list of something".  For 
> example, a vector (a 1 dimensional noun) is a list of scalars, a 
> table (2D) is a list of vectors, a cube (3D) is a list of tables, 
> and so on.  The items of a noun are whatever it's a list of.  The 
> items of a vector are scalars, the items of a table are vectors, 
> the items of a cube are tables, and so on.
> 
> Any verb can be limited to a certain rank of noun.  That is, it 
> can be impossible for a verb to see a noun of higher than a 
> specific rank.  For example,  +  can only see scalars, because  
> list+list  makes no sense:  only scalars can be added.  So, no 
> matter how hard you try,  +  will only ever see a scalar at a 
> time.  The highest rank of noun a certain verb can see is a "cell" 
> for that verb. 
> 
> Of course, you can feed a verb a higher ranked argument, in which 
> case there will be more than one cell, but the verb will still 
> only see one cell at a time.  That's why  list+list  does work: 
> it's operating piecewise, adding a scalar at a time.
> 
> A verb can have infinite (unbound) rank, in which case ANY 
> argument will only have one cell.  Think of the monad  <  (box), 
> for example.  No matter what argument you give it, it treats that 
> argument as an indivisible whole, and returns it in a box.  
> 
> A verb can also define its cells in terms of the rank of the noun, 
> so, for example,  "_1  means "operate on rank one less than the 
> argument", which means "treat the argument like a list of cells", 
> which means "operate on the items of the argument".  So, in the 
> special case of a verb  "_1  , the items and the cells are the same.
> 
> Does that clarify?


----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to