On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 3:31 PM, Filippo Diotalevi <[email protected]> wrote:
> - for package names, I propose org.ops4j.pax.pyo No problem. > - for the license is it ok to use (like in some examples of pax-runner) > /* > * Copyright 2009 the original author or authors. > * > * Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 ..... etc etc > */ > using the @author tags to list all the authors ? No. @author tag bears no legal weight and should be avoided all together. Multiple lines in Copyright section of the header, as explained by Alin, is the proper way to go. > - as for the SVN repo, should I use my personal folder inside the laboratory? > something like i.e. > https://scm.ops4j.org/repos/ops4j/laboratory/users/fdiotalevi/pyo ? That's a good starting point. I am curious; There are plenty of provisioning systems out there. P2 for instance, or look at http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/AceProposal which is asking to become an Apache incubating project. Could you elaborate "Why Pryo?" ? Not that it matters for whether you can bring your code here... Cheers -- Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er I work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
