On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 2:24 PM, Niclas Hedhman <[email protected]> wrote > Marcel (main proposer) is also a close friend in our Pax community, so > why not talk to him and see if we should instead aim for a combined > effort. One of the main arguments of "Why Ace?" is "Because P2 is too > heavy-weight.". And I have seen Ace live before, and there is a lot of > effort behind it, able to handle "push outs" to 100s of thousands of > devices, has concepts of application suites, and deep understanding of > the OSGi model (at package level). So, for your own sanity, I suggest > you join forces and I can ask Marcel to include your codebase into the > Ace proposal, and with that be part of the initial community around > Ace.
Hi Niclas, I also talked to Marcel at ApacheCon, and I can assure I will be the first to download Ace as soon as it is available, and to contribute if I can. At the time Ace wasn't already proposed, so I wasn't sure about the schedule for its opensourcing. So for the time being I'll wait to see how they Ace-opensourcing goes, and won't commit my code to Pax. -- Filippo Diotalevi _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
