On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 6:16 PM, Alin Dreghiciu <adreghi...@gmail.com> wrote: > For 1) I think we do not have released artifacts that depends on snapshots. > Do we? > For 2), after discussion with Sonatype guys they say that is just > a recommendation, not something mandatory. And if we do move all is in > the http://repository.ops4j.org/mvn-releases we will get all our > dependencies (beside dependency on osgi artifacts) into central anyhow. > Question is we should apply this only for > 1.0 releases.
Why not just "do the right thing", and gradually move things to m2release, one by one, with review for each? Wholesale "grab and dump", sounds like a "hack" because we are generally lazy. Suggested Action Plan; 1. Release "Base" under a new name, and as 1.0. 2. Release Pax URL and Pax Swissbox as 1.0. And all of them to /m2release. Once those are out the door, Runner Web and Exam can follow reasonably soon after. Cheers -- Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er I work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug _______________________________________________ general mailing list general@lists.ops4j.org http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
