Artem,

Thanks for your feedback and clarification. We will update the survey
questions to avoid confusions.

thanks
- jf.ding

On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 12:42:34PM +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> Hi JF,
> 
> there is a lot of confusion in this thread about what are you going to
> do and why.
> 
> And frankly, the announcement is guilty in that. You did not carefully
> and nicely explain what exactly you do, and why exactly, and which users
> would be affected and how exactly.
> 
> I suggest you guys to come up with a new good survey description. Make
> sure it answers the above questions. Also, go through this thread, find
> out what confused people, and make sure you have a Q&A section in your
> new survey, and the section clears the confusion.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> P.S. What I found out from talking to people, _not_ from the announce:
> 
> 1. The intended change _only_ affects mic and gbs, nothing else.
> 2. The change is about stopping producing i586 mic and gbs builds. Other
> tools will still have i586 builds.
> 3. The change _does not_ mean that mic/gbs won't be able to generate
> i586 images.
> 4. On the opposite, x86_68 mic/gbs _will_ be able to generate i586
> images.
> 5. So this will only limit people in choosing their _build host_, not
> the _target Tizen OS_.
> 
> Right?
> 
> On Mon, 2013-09-23 at 17:33 +0800, Jian-feng Ding wrote:
> > Carsten,
> > 
> > All the embarrassings you are talking about just does not exist :)
> > 
> > Current Tizen pkg build is self-hosted, both ARM and IA, both 32bit and
> > 64bit.
> > 
> > Current problem we are talking about is the developers' working distro, not
> > the Tizen runtime:)
> > 
> > thanks
> > - jf.ding
> > 
> > 
> > On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 06:23:37PM +0900, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> > > On Mon, 23 Sep 2013 08:28:06 +0300 Leon Anavi <[email protected]> said:
> > > 
> > > > Hi Daniel, Carsten, All,
> > > > 
> > > > On 2013-09-23 03:46, Daniel Juyung Seo wrote:
> > > > > On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 8:53 AM, Carsten Haitzler
> > > > >> imagine if all the engineers and executives etc. at bmw drove fords
> > > > >> because
> > > > >> "bmw's can't manage to get us to the office without breaking down".
> > > > > 
> > > > > Awesome analogy.
> > > > > 
> > > > > I am also against dropping 32 bit system support for dev tools.
> > > > > 
> > > > > I bet many people I know use 32 bit system yet.
> > > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > The example with the cars is nice but I don't think it's very 
> > > > appropriate. In my opinion it is fine to drop 32-bit support although I 
> > > > still keep 32-bit distributions on some of my older computers.
> > > > 
> > > > Today nobody uses 16-bit OS for development of Tizen and in long term I 
> > > > don't expect anybody to be using 32-bit. So dropping 32-bit support is 
> > > > just a matter of time. Almost all of the CPU for personal computers 
> > > > produced in the last 5 years are with 64-bit instruction sets. The 
> > > > majority of developers (including me) that still have 32-bit OS on some 
> > > > computers actually have a compatible 64-bit hardware and just have to 
> > > > replace the OS and the dev environment with a 64-bit version.
> > > 
> > > 64bit os's come with a major cost in memory footprint for pointers... it's
> > > quite measurable. and that doesn't change the fact that:
> > > 
> > > 1. arm is STILL 32bit and will be for a long time still. if tizen can't 
> > > be built
> > > ON an arm platform (which is 32bit) then it can't self-host on arm... 
> > > which is
> > > embarrassing.
> > > 2. reality is that on x86 we likely might support 32bit tizen simply due 
> > > to the
> > > memory footprint issues, and there is still x32 which is 32bit address 
> > > space
> > > WITH 64bit instructions for max perf and best footprint. if we can't work 
> > > on
> > > x32 or ix86 we can't self host. embarrassing.
> > > 3. you do know that intel mobile chips (for tablets/phones) are not 64bit
> > > still (i thought baytrail may support 64bit in at least some configs, but
> > > older ones... no 64bit, and baytrail devices as best i know are still not
> > > shipping as of today)... :) again - if we can't self host on these...
> > > embarrassing.
> > > 
> > > :)
> > > 
> > > > Best regards,
> > > > Leon
> > > 
> > > 
> > > -- 
> > > Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) <[email protected]>
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > General mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > > https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/general
> > _______________________________________________
> > General mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/general
> 
> -- 
> Best Regards,
> Artem Bityutskiy
> 
_______________________________________________
General mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/general

Reply via email to