No idea, its NTFS on Windows 7, 64 bit, JDK 1.4.2_19-32bit. The test now works, so cannot reproduce.
Not idea what we should do! ----- Uwe Schindler H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen http://www.thetaphi.de eMail: [email protected] > -----Original Message----- > From: Michael McCandless [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2010 2:36 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Lucene Java 2.9.3 and 3.0.2 artifacts to be > released > > This looks like something new to me (doesn't ring a bell). > > It looks odd -- the assertion that's tripping would seem to indicate that a file > that we are copying into a CFS file (after flushing) is still changing while we > are copying, which is not good. All files should be closed before we build the > CFS. Strange... was this just a local hard drive / NTFS file system, Uwe? > > I also can't repro, so far -- I have a while(1) stress test running on OpenSolaris > and Windows Server 2003, but no failures yet... > > Can anyone else get this test to fail? > > Mike > > On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 7:54 AM, Uwe Schindler <[email protected]> wrote: > > I ran the tests on my computer and with 2.9.3 I got a failure, which i > > cannot reproduce: > > > > [junit] Testsuite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestThreadedOptimize > > [junit] Tests run: 1, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 9,017 > > sec > > [junit] > > [junit] ------------- Standard Output --------------- > > [junit] Thread-45: hit exception > > [junit] java.lang.AssertionError > > [junit] at > > > org.apache.lucene.index.CompoundFileWriter.close(CompoundFileWriter.ja > > va:195 > > ) > > [junit] at > > > org.apache.lucene.index.DocumentsWriter.createCompoundFile(Document > sWr > > iter.j > > ava:672) > > [junit] at > > org.apache.lucene.index.IndexWriter.doFlushInternal(IndexWriter.java:4 > > 418) > > [junit] at > > org.apache.lucene.index.IndexWriter.doFlush(IndexWriter.java:4264) > > [junit] at > > org.apache.lucene.index.IndexWriter.flush(IndexWriter.java:4255) > > [junit] at > > > org.apache.lucene.index.IndexWriter.addDocument(IndexWriter.java:2546) > > [junit] at > > > org.apache.lucene.index.IndexWriter.addDocument(IndexWriter.java:2500) > > [junit] at > > > org.apache.lucene.index.TestThreadedOptimize$1.run(TestThreadedOptimi > z > > e.java > > :92) > > [junit] ------------- ---------------- --------------- > > [junit] Testcase: > > testThreadedOptimize(org.apache.lucene.index.TestThreadedOptimize): > > FAILED > > [junit] null > > [junit] junit.framework.AssertionFailedError > > [junit] at > > > org.apache.lucene.index.TestThreadedOptimize.runTest(TestThreadedOpti > m > > ize.ja > > va:113) > > [junit] at > > > org.apache.lucene.index.TestThreadedOptimize.testThreadedOptimize(Test > > Thread > > edOptimize.java:154) > > [junit] at > > org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase.runBare(LuceneTestCase.java:221) > > [junit] > > [junit] > > [junit] Test org.apache.lucene.index.TestThreadedOptimize FAILED > > > > > > Maybe it's just the bug in the test we already know, if this is so, we > > can proceed with releasing. It happened in JDK 1.4.2 when doing a test > > build on my windows machine of 2.9.3-src.zip. > > > > Mike, maybe it's an already fixed test-only bug (missing "volatile" on > > field in this test)? > > > > Uwe > > > > ----- > > Uwe Schindler > > H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen > > http://www.thetaphi.de > > eMail: [email protected] > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Uwe Schindler [mailto:[email protected]] > >> Sent: Monday, June 07, 2010 5:21 PM > >> To: [email protected] > >> Subject: [VOTE] Apache Lucene Java 2.9.3 and 3.0.2 artifacts to be > > released > >> > >> Hi all, > >> > >> I have posted a release candidate for both Lucene Java 2.9.3 and > >> 3.0.2 > > (which > >> both have the same bug fix level, functionality and release > >> announcement), build from revision 951790 of the corresponding > branches. > >> Thanks for all your help! Please test them and give your votes, the > > scheduled > >> release date for both versions is Friday, June 18th, 2010. Only votes > >> from Lucene PMC are binding, but everyone is welcome to check the > >> release candidate and voice their approval or disapproval. The vote > >> passes if at > > least > >> three binding +1 votes are cast. > >> > >> We planned the parallel release with one announcement because of > >> their parallel development / bug fix level to emphasize that they are > >> equal > > except > >> deprecation removal and Java 5 since major version 3. I will post the > > possible > >> release announcement soon for corrections. > >> > >> Artifacts can be found at: > >> http://people.apache.org/~uschindler/staging-area/lucene-2.9.3-3.0.2- > >> take1-r > >> ev951790/ > >> > >> Changes: > >> http://people.apache.org/~uschindler/staging-area/lucene-2.9.3-3.0.2- > >> take1-r > >> ev951790/changes-2.9.3/Changes.html > >> http://people.apache.org/~uschindler/staging-area/lucene-2.9.3-3.0.2- > >> take1-r > >> ev951790/changes-2.9.3/Contrib-Changes.html > >> > >> http://people.apache.org/~uschindler/staging-area/lucene-2.9.3-3.0.2- > >> take1-r > >> ev951790/changes-3.0.2/Changes.html > >> http://people.apache.org/~uschindler/staging-area/lucene-2.9.3-3.0.2- > >> take1-r > >> ev951790/changes-3.0.2/Contrib-Changes.html > >> > >> Maven artifacts: > >> http://people.apache.org/~uschindler/staging-area/lucene-2.9.3-3.0.2- > >> take1-r > >> ev951790/maven/ > >> > >> Happy testing! > >> > >> P.S.: I already tested the latest 3.0.2 artifacts with pangaea.de :-) > >> > >> ----- > >> Uwe Schindler > >> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen > >> http://www.thetaphi.de > >> eMail: [email protected] > >> > > > > > >
