Alas, I have 4 envs (Windows Server 2003, OpenSolaris 2009.06, CentOS 5.4, OS X 10.6.2, running stress tests for 4+ hours now, and I haven't hit a single failure...
If nobody else can repro this, I think we should not hold up the release? Mike On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 8:44 AM, Uwe Schindler <[email protected]> wrote: > No idea, its NTFS on Windows 7, 64 bit, JDK 1.4.2_19-32bit. The test now > works, so cannot reproduce. > > Not idea what we should do! > > ----- > Uwe Schindler > H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen > http://www.thetaphi.de > eMail: [email protected] > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Michael McCandless [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2010 2:36 PM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Lucene Java 2.9.3 and 3.0.2 artifacts to be >> released >> >> This looks like something new to me (doesn't ring a bell). >> >> It looks odd -- the assertion that's tripping would seem to indicate that > a file >> that we are copying into a CFS file (after flushing) is still changing > while we >> are copying, which is not good. All files should be closed before we > build the >> CFS. Strange... was this just a local hard drive / NTFS file system, Uwe? >> >> I also can't repro, so far -- I have a while(1) stress test running on > OpenSolaris >> and Windows Server 2003, but no failures yet... >> >> Can anyone else get this test to fail? >> >> Mike >> >> On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 7:54 AM, Uwe Schindler <[email protected]> wrote: >> > I ran the tests on my computer and with 2.9.3 I got a failure, which i >> > cannot reproduce: >> > >> > [junit] Testsuite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestThreadedOptimize >> > [junit] Tests run: 1, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 9,017 >> > sec >> > [junit] >> > [junit] ------------- Standard Output --------------- >> > [junit] Thread-45: hit exception >> > [junit] java.lang.AssertionError >> > [junit] at >> > >> org.apache.lucene.index.CompoundFileWriter.close(CompoundFileWriter.ja >> > va:195 >> > ) >> > [junit] at >> > >> org.apache.lucene.index.DocumentsWriter.createCompoundFile(Document >> sWr >> > iter.j >> > ava:672) >> > [junit] at >> > org.apache.lucene.index.IndexWriter.doFlushInternal(IndexWriter.java:4 >> > 418) >> > [junit] at >> > org.apache.lucene.index.IndexWriter.doFlush(IndexWriter.java:4264) >> > [junit] at >> > org.apache.lucene.index.IndexWriter.flush(IndexWriter.java:4255) >> > [junit] at >> > >> org.apache.lucene.index.IndexWriter.addDocument(IndexWriter.java:2546) >> > [junit] at >> > >> org.apache.lucene.index.IndexWriter.addDocument(IndexWriter.java:2500) >> > [junit] at >> > >> org.apache.lucene.index.TestThreadedOptimize$1.run(TestThreadedOptimi >> z >> > e.java >> > :92) >> > [junit] ------------- ---------------- --------------- >> > [junit] Testcase: >> > testThreadedOptimize(org.apache.lucene.index.TestThreadedOptimize): >> > FAILED >> > [junit] null >> > [junit] junit.framework.AssertionFailedError >> > [junit] at >> > >> org.apache.lucene.index.TestThreadedOptimize.runTest(TestThreadedOpti >> m >> > ize.ja >> > va:113) >> > [junit] at >> > >> org.apache.lucene.index.TestThreadedOptimize.testThreadedOptimize(Test >> > Thread >> > edOptimize.java:154) >> > [junit] at >> > org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase.runBare(LuceneTestCase.java:221) >> > [junit] >> > [junit] >> > [junit] Test org.apache.lucene.index.TestThreadedOptimize FAILED >> > >> > >> > Maybe it's just the bug in the test we already know, if this is so, we >> > can proceed with releasing. It happened in JDK 1.4.2 when doing a test >> > build on my windows machine of 2.9.3-src.zip. >> > >> > Mike, maybe it's an already fixed test-only bug (missing "volatile" on >> > field in this test)? >> > >> > Uwe >> > >> > ----- >> > Uwe Schindler >> > H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen >> > http://www.thetaphi.de >> > eMail: [email protected] >> > >> > >> >> -----Original Message----- >> >> From: Uwe Schindler [mailto:[email protected]] >> >> Sent: Monday, June 07, 2010 5:21 PM >> >> To: [email protected] >> >> Subject: [VOTE] Apache Lucene Java 2.9.3 and 3.0.2 artifacts to be >> > released >> >> >> >> Hi all, >> >> >> >> I have posted a release candidate for both Lucene Java 2.9.3 and >> >> 3.0.2 >> > (which >> >> both have the same bug fix level, functionality and release >> >> announcement), build from revision 951790 of the corresponding >> branches. >> >> Thanks for all your help! Please test them and give your votes, the >> > scheduled >> >> release date for both versions is Friday, June 18th, 2010. Only votes >> >> from Lucene PMC are binding, but everyone is welcome to check the >> >> release candidate and voice their approval or disapproval. The vote >> >> passes if at >> > least >> >> three binding +1 votes are cast. >> >> >> >> We planned the parallel release with one announcement because of >> >> their parallel development / bug fix level to emphasize that they are >> >> equal >> > except >> >> deprecation removal and Java 5 since major version 3. I will post the >> > possible >> >> release announcement soon for corrections. >> >> >> >> Artifacts can be found at: >> >> http://people.apache.org/~uschindler/staging-area/lucene-2.9.3-3.0.2- >> >> take1-r >> >> ev951790/ >> >> >> >> Changes: >> >> http://people.apache.org/~uschindler/staging-area/lucene-2.9.3-3.0.2- >> >> take1-r >> >> ev951790/changes-2.9.3/Changes.html >> >> http://people.apache.org/~uschindler/staging-area/lucene-2.9.3-3.0.2- >> >> take1-r >> >> ev951790/changes-2.9.3/Contrib-Changes.html >> >> >> >> http://people.apache.org/~uschindler/staging-area/lucene-2.9.3-3.0.2- >> >> take1-r >> >> ev951790/changes-3.0.2/Changes.html >> >> http://people.apache.org/~uschindler/staging-area/lucene-2.9.3-3.0.2- >> >> take1-r >> >> ev951790/changes-3.0.2/Contrib-Changes.html >> >> >> >> Maven artifacts: >> >> http://people.apache.org/~uschindler/staging-area/lucene-2.9.3-3.0.2- >> >> take1-r >> >> ev951790/maven/ >> >> >> >> Happy testing! >> >> >> >> P.S.: I already tested the latest 3.0.2 artifacts with pangaea.de :-) >> >> >> >> ----- >> >> Uwe Schindler >> >> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen >> >> http://www.thetaphi.de >> >> eMail: [email protected] >> >> >> > >> > >> > > >
