This is why I ask first. ----- Uwe Schindler H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen http://www.thetaphi.de eMail: [email protected]
> -----Original Message----- > From: Mark Miller [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Friday, June 11, 2010 1:49 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Lucene Java 2.9.3 and 3.0.2 artifacts to be > released > > I'd say that's a very weird type of issue to cause a respin and get everyone to > test and vote again, but I won't say I'm against. > > - Mark > > http://www.lucidimagination.com (mobile) > > On Jun 11, 2010, at 7:13 AM, "Uwe Schindler" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > Simon and me decided, that we want to have LUCENE-2494 (Modify > > ParallelMultiSearcher to use a CompletionService instead of slowly > > polling for results) inside Lucene Java 3.0.2. This is an significant > > performance improvement. It will not go to 2.9.3, as its Java 1.5 > > only. > > > > I would like to respin 3.0.2, the artifacts of 2.9.3 would stay as > > they are, as the vote seems completed. As the date of publishing was > > planned for Friday next week, we have enough time. It would be nice, > > if you could test again, I will post new artifacts soon! > > > > Is somebody against? > > > > Uwe > > > > ----- > > Uwe Schindler > > H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen > > http://www.thetaphi.de > > eMail: [email protected] > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Michael McCandless [mailto:[email protected]] > >> Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2010 6:44 PM > >> To: [email protected] > >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Lucene Java 2.9.3 and 3.0.2 artifacts to > >> be released > >> > >> Alas, I have 4 envs (Windows Server 2003, OpenSolaris 2009.06, CentOS > >> 5.4, OS X 10.6.2, running stress tests for 4+ hours now, and I > >> haven't hit a > > single > >> failure... > >> > >> If nobody else can repro this, I think we should not hold up the > >> release? > >> > >> Mike > >> > >> On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 8:44 AM, Uwe Schindler <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >>> No idea, its NTFS on Windows 7, 64 bit, JDK 1.4.2_19-32bit. The test > >>> now works, so cannot reproduce. > >>> > >>> Not idea what we should do! > >>> > >>> ----- > >>> Uwe Schindler > >>> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen http://www.thetaphi.de > >>> eMail: [email protected] > >>> > >>> > >>>> -----Original Message----- > >>>> From: Michael McCandless [mailto:[email protected]] > >>>> Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2010 2:36 PM > >>>> To: [email protected] > >>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Lucene Java 2.9.3 and 3.0.2 artifacts to > >>>> be released > >>>> > >>>> This looks like something new to me (doesn't ring a bell). > >>>> > >>>> It looks odd -- the assertion that's tripping would seem to > >>>> indicate > >>>> that > >>> a file > >>>> that we are copying into a CFS file (after flushing) is still > >>>> changing > >>> while we > >>>> are copying, which is not good. All files should be closed > >>>> before we > >>> build the > >>>> CFS. Strange... was this just a local hard drive / NTFS file > >>>> system, > > Uwe? > >>>> > >>>> I also can't repro, so far -- I have a while(1) stress test running > >>>> on > >>> OpenSolaris > >>>> and Windows Server 2003, but no failures yet... > >>>> > >>>> Can anyone else get this test to fail? > >>>> > >>>> Mike > >>>> > >>>> On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 7:54 AM, Uwe Schindler <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >>>>> I ran the tests on my computer and with 2.9.3 I got a failure, > >>>>> which i cannot reproduce: > >>>>> > >>>>> [junit] Testsuite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestThreadedOptimize > >>>>> [junit] Tests run: 1, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: > >>>>> 9,017 sec > >>>>> [junit] > >>>>> [junit] ------------- Standard Output --------------- > >>>>> [junit] Thread-45: hit exception > >>>>> [junit] java.lang.AssertionError > >>>>> [junit] at > >>>>> > >>>> > >> > org.apache.lucene.index.CompoundFileWriter.close(CompoundFileWriter.j > >>>> a > >>>>> va:195 > >>>>> ) > >>>>> [junit] at > >>>>> > >>>> > >> > org.apache.lucene.index.DocumentsWriter.createCompoundFile(Document > >>>> sWr > >>>>> iter.j > >>>>> ava:672) > >>>>> [junit] at > >>>>> org.apache.lucene.index.IndexWriter.doFlushInternal > >>>>> (IndexWriter.jav > >>>>> a:4 > >>>>> 418) > >>>>> [junit] at > >>>>> org.apache.lucene.index.IndexWriter.doFlush(IndexWriter.java:4264) > >>>>> [junit] at > >>>>> org.apache.lucene.index.IndexWriter.flush(IndexWriter.java:4255) > >>>>> [junit] at > >>>>> > >>>> > >> > org.apache.lucene.index.IndexWriter.addDocument(IndexWriter.java:2546 > >>>> ) > >>>>> [junit] at > >>>>> > >>>> > >> > org.apache.lucene.index.IndexWriter.addDocument(IndexWriter.java:2500 > >>>> ) > >>>>> [junit] at > >>>>> > >>>> > >> > org.apache.lucene.index.TestThreadedOptimize$1.run(TestThreadedOptimi > >>>> z > >>>>> e.java > >>>>> :92) > >>>>> [junit] ------------- ---------------- --------------- > >>>>> [junit] Testcase: > >>>>> > >> testThreadedOptimize(org.apache.lucene.index.TestThreadedOptimize): > >>>>> FAILED > >>>>> [junit] null > >>>>> [junit] junit.framework.AssertionFailedError > >>>>> [junit] at > >>>>> > >>>> > >> > org.apache.lucene.index.TestThreadedOptimize.runTest(TestThreadedOpti > >>>> m > >>>>> ize.ja > >>>>> va:113) > >>>>> [junit] at > >>>>> > >>>> > >> > org.apache.lucene.index.TestThreadedOptimize.testThreadedOptimize(Tes > >>>> t > >>>>> Thread > >>>>> edOptimize.java:154) > >>>>> [junit] at > >>>>> org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase.runBare > >>>>> (LuceneTestCase.java:2 > >>>>> 21) > >>>>> [junit] > >>>>> [junit] > >>>>> [junit] Test org.apache.lucene.index.TestThreadedOptimize > >>>>> FAILED > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> Maybe it's just the bug in the test we already know, if this is > >>>>> so, > >>>>> we can proceed with releasing. It happened in JDK 1.4.2 when doing > >>>>> a test build on my windows machine of 2.9.3-src.zip. > >>>>> > >>>>> Mike, maybe it's an already fixed test-only bug (missing > >>>>> "volatile" > >>>>> on field in this test)? > >>>>> > >>>>> Uwe > >>>>> > >>>>> ----- > >>>>> Uwe Schindler > >>>>> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen http://www.thetaphi.de > >>>>> eMail: [email protected] > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>> -----Original Message----- > >>>>>> From: Uwe Schindler [mailto:[email protected]] > >>>>>> Sent: Monday, June 07, 2010 5:21 PM > >>>>>> To: [email protected] > >>>>>> Subject: [VOTE] Apache Lucene Java 2.9.3 and 3.0.2 artifacts to > >>>>>> be > >>>>> released > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Hi all, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I have posted a release candidate for both Lucene Java 2.9.3 and > >>>>>> 3.0.2 > >>>>> (which > >>>>>> both have the same bug fix level, functionality and release > >>>>>> announcement), build from revision 951790 of the corresponding > >>>> branches. > >>>>>> Thanks for all your help! Please test them and give your votes, > >>>>>> the > >>>>> scheduled > >>>>>> release date for both versions is Friday, June 18th, 2010. Only > > votes > >>>>>> from Lucene PMC are binding, but everyone is welcome to check the > >>>>>> release candidate and voice their approval or disapproval. The > >>>>>> vote > >>>>>> passes if at > >>>>> least > >>>>>> three binding +1 votes are cast. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> We planned the parallel release with one announcement because of > >>>>>> their parallel development / bug fix level to emphasize that they > > are > >>>>>> equal > >>>>> except > >>>>>> deprecation removal and Java 5 since major version 3. I will post > > the > >>>>> possible > >>>>>> release announcement soon for corrections. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Artifacts can be found at: > >>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~uschindler/staging-area/lucene-2.9.3- > >> 3.0.2- > >>>>>> take1-r > >>>>>> ev951790/ > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Changes: > >>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~uschindler/staging-area/lucene-2.9.3- > >> 3.0.2- > >>>>>> take1-r > >>>>>> ev951790/changes-2.9.3/Changes.html > >>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~uschindler/staging-area/lucene-2.9.3- > >> 3.0.2- > >>>>>> take1-r > >>>>>> ev951790/changes-2.9.3/Contrib-Changes.html > >>>>>> > >>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~uschindler/staging-area/lucene-2.9.3- > >> 3.0.2- > >>>>>> take1-r > >>>>>> ev951790/changes-3.0.2/Changes.html > >>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~uschindler/staging-area/lucene-2.9.3- > >> 3.0.2- > >>>>>> take1-r > >>>>>> ev951790/changes-3.0.2/Contrib-Changes.html > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Maven artifacts: > >>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~uschindler/staging-area/lucene-2.9.3- > >> 3.0.2- > >>>>>> take1-r > >>>>>> ev951790/maven/ > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Happy testing! > >>>>>> > >>>>>> P.S.: I already tested the latest 3.0.2 artifacts with pangaea.de > > :-) > >>>>>> > >>>>>> ----- > >>>>>> Uwe Schindler > >>>>>> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen > >>>>>> http://www.thetaphi.de > >>>>>> eMail: [email protected] > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>> > >>> > >
