I'd say that's a very weird type of issue to cause a respin and get
everyone to test and vote again, but I won't say I'm against.
- Mark
http://www.lucidimagination.com (mobile)
On Jun 11, 2010, at 7:13 AM, "Uwe Schindler" <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi all,
Simon and me decided, that we want to have LUCENE-2494 (Modify
ParallelMultiSearcher to use a CompletionService instead of slowly
polling
for results) inside Lucene Java 3.0.2. This is an significant
performance
improvement. It will not go to 2.9.3, as its Java 1.5 only.
I would like to respin 3.0.2, the artifacts of 2.9.3 would stay as
they are,
as the vote seems completed. As the date of publishing was planned for
Friday next week, we have enough time. It would be nice, if you
could test
again, I will post new artifacts soon!
Is somebody against?
Uwe
-----
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: [email protected]
-----Original Message-----
From: Michael McCandless [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2010 6:44 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Lucene Java 2.9.3 and 3.0.2 artifacts to
be
released
Alas, I have 4 envs (Windows Server 2003, OpenSolaris 2009.06,
CentOS 5.4,
OS X 10.6.2, running stress tests for 4+ hours now, and I haven't
hit a
single
failure...
If nobody else can repro this, I think we should not hold up the
release?
Mike
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 8:44 AM, Uwe Schindler <[email protected]>
wrote:
No idea, its NTFS on Windows 7, 64 bit, JDK 1.4.2_19-32bit. The test
now works, so cannot reproduce.
Not idea what we should do!
-----
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: [email protected]
-----Original Message-----
From: Michael McCandless [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2010 2:36 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Lucene Java 2.9.3 and 3.0.2 artifacts to
be released
This looks like something new to me (doesn't ring a bell).
It looks odd -- the assertion that's tripping would seem to
indicate
that
a file
that we are copying into a CFS file (after flushing) is still
changing
while we
are copying, which is not good. All files should be closed
before we
build the
CFS. Strange... was this just a local hard drive / NTFS file
system,
Uwe?
I also can't repro, so far -- I have a while(1) stress test running
on
OpenSolaris
and Windows Server 2003, but no failures yet...
Can anyone else get this test to fail?
Mike
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 7:54 AM, Uwe Schindler <[email protected]>
wrote:
I ran the tests on my computer and with 2.9.3 I got a failure,
which i cannot reproduce:
[junit] Testsuite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestThreadedOptimize
[junit] Tests run: 1, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Time elapsed:
9,017 sec
[junit]
[junit] ------------- Standard Output ---------------
[junit] Thread-45: hit exception
[junit] java.lang.AssertionError
[junit] at
org.apache.lucene.index.CompoundFileWriter.close(CompoundFileWriter.j
a
va:195
)
[junit] at
org.apache.lucene.index.DocumentsWriter.createCompoundFile(Document
sWr
iter.j
ava:672)
[junit] at
org.apache.lucene.index.IndexWriter.doFlushInternal
(IndexWriter.jav
a:4
418)
[junit] at
org.apache.lucene.index.IndexWriter.doFlush(IndexWriter.java:4264)
[junit] at
org.apache.lucene.index.IndexWriter.flush(IndexWriter.java:4255)
[junit] at
org.apache.lucene.index.IndexWriter.addDocument(IndexWriter.java:2546
)
[junit] at
org.apache.lucene.index.IndexWriter.addDocument(IndexWriter.java:2500
)
[junit] at
org.apache.lucene.index.TestThreadedOptimize$1.run(TestThreadedOptimi
z
e.java
:92)
[junit] ------------- ---------------- ---------------
[junit] Testcase:
testThreadedOptimize(org.apache.lucene.index.TestThreadedOptimize):
FAILED
[junit] null
[junit] junit.framework.AssertionFailedError
[junit] at
org.apache.lucene.index.TestThreadedOptimize.runTest(TestThreadedOpti
m
ize.ja
va:113)
[junit] at
org.apache.lucene.index.TestThreadedOptimize.testThreadedOptimize(Tes
t
Thread
edOptimize.java:154)
[junit] at
org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase.runBare
(LuceneTestCase.java:2
21)
[junit]
[junit]
[junit] Test org.apache.lucene.index.TestThreadedOptimize
FAILED
Maybe it's just the bug in the test we already know, if this is
so,
we can proceed with releasing. It happened in JDK 1.4.2 when doing
a test build on my windows machine of 2.9.3-src.zip.
Mike, maybe it's an already fixed test-only bug (missing
"volatile"
on field in this test)?
Uwe
-----
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: [email protected]
-----Original Message-----
From: Uwe Schindler [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, June 07, 2010 5:21 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [VOTE] Apache Lucene Java 2.9.3 and 3.0.2 artifacts to
be
released
Hi all,
I have posted a release candidate for both Lucene Java 2.9.3 and
3.0.2
(which
both have the same bug fix level, functionality and release
announcement), build from revision 951790 of the corresponding
branches.
Thanks for all your help! Please test them and give your votes,
the
scheduled
release date for both versions is Friday, June 18th, 2010. Only
votes
from Lucene PMC are binding, but everyone is welcome to check the
release candidate and voice their approval or disapproval. The
vote
passes if at
least
three binding +1 votes are cast.
We planned the parallel release with one announcement because of
their parallel development / bug fix level to emphasize that they
are
equal
except
deprecation removal and Java 5 since major version 3. I will post
the
possible
release announcement soon for corrections.
Artifacts can be found at:
http://people.apache.org/~uschindler/staging-area/lucene-2.9.3-
3.0.2-
take1-r
ev951790/
Changes:
http://people.apache.org/~uschindler/staging-area/lucene-2.9.3-
3.0.2-
take1-r
ev951790/changes-2.9.3/Changes.html
http://people.apache.org/~uschindler/staging-area/lucene-2.9.3-
3.0.2-
take1-r
ev951790/changes-2.9.3/Contrib-Changes.html
http://people.apache.org/~uschindler/staging-area/lucene-2.9.3-
3.0.2-
take1-r
ev951790/changes-3.0.2/Changes.html
http://people.apache.org/~uschindler/staging-area/lucene-2.9.3-
3.0.2-
take1-r
ev951790/changes-3.0.2/Contrib-Changes.html
Maven artifacts:
http://people.apache.org/~uschindler/staging-area/lucene-2.9.3-
3.0.2-
take1-r
ev951790/maven/
Happy testing!
P.S.: I already tested the latest 3.0.2 artifacts with pangaea.de
:-)
-----
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: [email protected]
