One small concern: "core" already means something within Lucene Java.
So we'd have Lucene Core core (as opposed to contrib). Should cores have cores? It seems against the will of universe somehow. Steve > -----Original Message----- > From: Grant Ingersoll [mailto:gsing...@apache.org] > Sent: Monday, November 08, 2010 10:58 AM > To: general list > Subject: [DISCUSS] Lucene Java -> Lucene Core > > Hi Luceneers, esp. PMC and Committers, > > I'm in the process of reviewing our branding per the Trademarks committee > sending out requirements. So, expect to see some changes to the website > and logos in the coming days as well as, potentially, a request for help. > > Per the Branding Requirements at > http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/pmcs, I think we should stop > calling our core Java implementation Lucene Java, since Java is an Oracle > TM, and move to simply calling it Lucene Core or Lucene for Java. > > I'm inclined to call it Lucene Core or (Core, for short). Most of us just > call it Lucene anyway, so the Core part really is only for navigation > purposes on the website. > > I'd like to discuss this for a day or two and then call a vote. > > Thoughts? > > -Grant
