On Nov 8, 2010, at 12:18 PM, Ted Dunning wrote: > One name that might work is "Lucene".
Yeah, but then you have Lucene/Lucene as in the TLP being named Lucene. > > Let that mean the java version and slightly ambiguously refer to the entire > project depending on context. Then use qualifiers > for things like lucene.net. > > I would contend that we already have this usage and going with something > else will be a difficult uphill task. > > On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 9:10 AM, Steven A Rowe <sar...@syr.edu> wrote: > >> One small concern: "core" already means something within Lucene Java. >> >> So we'd have Lucene Core core (as opposed to contrib). Kind of, there isn't actually anything named core other than the jar, and I think that actually makes sense given the proposed change. It is the core and that aligns with the would be project name. -Grant
