Yep. I see that as a virtue rather than a defect. Truth in labeling and such.
A big part of the problem with lucene.net is that the Lucene TLP is essentially a Lucene-for-Java project and small things don't grow well in the shade. On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 9:37 AM, Grant Ingersoll <gsing...@apache.org> wrote: > On Nov 8, 2010, at 12:18 PM, Ted Dunning wrote: > > > One name that might work is "Lucene". > > Yeah, but then you have Lucene/Lucene as in the TLP being named Lucene. >
