Marcus, Please do not hijack threads. Start a separate thread.
On Nov 8, 2010, at 12:22 PM, marcus clemens wrote: > > hi > > i am looking for a java lucene solr contrator to work in west sussex . the > contract will last a year and its paying around £ 400 a day > > is this of interest to anyone . if so please send me a cv > > kind regards > >> Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2010 11:50:46 -0500 >> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Lucene Java -> Lucene Core >> From: ryan...@gmail.com >> To: general@lucene.apache.org >> >> +1 >> >> >> >> On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Grant Ingersoll <gsing...@apache.org> wrote: >>> Hi Luceneers, esp. PMC and Committers, >>> >>> I'm in the process of reviewing our branding per the Trademarks committee >>> sending out requirements. So, expect to see some changes to the website >>> and logos in the coming days as well as, potentially, a request for help. >>> >>> Per the Branding Requirements at >>> http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/pmcs, I think we should stop calling >>> our core Java implementation Lucene Java, since Java is an Oracle TM, and >>> move to simply calling it Lucene Core or Lucene for Java. >>> >>> I'm inclined to call it Lucene Core or (Core, for short). Most of us just >>> call it Lucene anyway, so the Core part really is only for navigation >>> purposes on the website. >>> >>> I'd like to discuss this for a day or two and then call a vote. >>> >>> Thoughts? >>> >>> -Grant >
