AFAIK, Axiom has no dependency on XmlSchema. Andreas
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 04:43, Sagara Gunathunga <sagara.gunathu...@gmail.com> wrote: > Benson, > I just tried to build Woden trunk with XmlSchema 2.0-SNAPSHOT but > found few incompatibles , basically Woden use XmlSchemaObjectTable > ,XmlSchemaObjectCollection classes that no longer available with > XmlSchema 2 .0. But I think we can port Woden to go with XmlSchema > 2.0 . Unfortunately these days I'm quite busy with other stuff and I > can't make any promise about exact time frame for these modifications. > I will look in to this in my earliest possible time. > > BTW I like to see how Axiom trunk compatible with XmlSchema 2.0 , > because Woden have to wait until Axiom make this move. > > Thanks ! > > On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 10:25 AM, Benson Margulies > <bimargul...@gmail.com> wrote: >> +1 here. >> >> Sagara, have you been following my progress on XmlSchema 2.0 :-) >> >> On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 9:50 AM, Sagara Gunathunga >> <sagara.gunathu...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Woden depends on XmlSchema and Axiom, so changes of above two projects >>> are important to us. I think the same matter is common for many WS sub >>> projects. If we all in a single dev list it's much more easy to have >>> common discussions. Only drawback is this will increase the traffic >>> on common lists but this seems not a big issue to me. >>> >>> +1 for merging dev and user lists. >>> >>> Thanks ! >>> >>> On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 5:10 PM, Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org> wrote: >>>> >>>> I'd like to make a proposal that I think would the WS community and would >>>> like >>>> peoples thoughts on the matter: >>>> >>>> I think it would be good for the community to combine all the *-...@ws >>>> mailing >>>> lists (and likely general@ as well) in to a single d...@ws.apache.org. >>>> Likewise, combine all the *-u...@ws lists into a single us...@. Probably >>>> a >>>> single commits list as well. >>>> >>>> I really think having separate lists has caused the community to fracture >>>> into >>>> small little eco systems with very little knowledge of what is happening in >>>> the rest of the community propogating from project to project. Doing >>>> releases >>>> is hard as the other PMC members may not be following the other projects at >>>> all. By combining them back into a few, broader lists, that should make >>>> it >>>> easier to follow what the entire community is doing. Once everyone >>>> really >>>> gets a feel for things and are communicating with each other, I think it >>>> will >>>> be easier to figure out what can/should be spun off, retired to attic, >>>> etc... >>>> >>>> Also, I'd like the new lists changed to be moderated lists. Moderated >>>> lists >>>> are much easer for new people to get involved in, especially through places >>>> like nabble. >>>> >>>> Thoughts? >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Daniel Kulp >>>> dk...@apache.org >>>> http://dankulp.com/blog >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Sagara Gunathunga >>> >>> Blog - http://ssagara.blogspot.com >>> Web - http://people.apache.org/~sagara/ >>> >> > > > > -- > Sagara Gunathunga > > Blog - http://ssagara.blogspot.com > Web - http://people.apache.org/~sagara/ >
