Sorry , this should be Axis2. IMO It's better to use same or compatible XmlSchems version among all Axis2 dependencies.
Thanks , On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 8:02 AM, Andreas Veithen <andreas.veit...@gmail.com> wrote: > AFAIK, Axiom has no dependency on XmlSchema. > > Andreas > > On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 04:43, Sagara Gunathunga > <sagara.gunathu...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Benson, >> I just tried to build Woden trunk with XmlSchema 2.0-SNAPSHOT but >> found few incompatibles , basically Woden use XmlSchemaObjectTable >> ,XmlSchemaObjectCollection classes that no longer available with >> XmlSchema 2 .0. But I think we can port Woden to go with XmlSchema >> 2.0 . Unfortunately these days I'm quite busy with other stuff and I >> can't make any promise about exact time frame for these modifications. >> I will look in to this in my earliest possible time. >> >> BTW I like to see how Axiom trunk compatible with XmlSchema 2.0 , >> because Woden have to wait until Axiom make this move. >> >> Thanks ! >> >> On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 10:25 AM, Benson Margulies >> <bimargul...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> +1 here. >>> >>> Sagara, have you been following my progress on XmlSchema 2.0 :-) >>> >>> On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 9:50 AM, Sagara Gunathunga >>> <sagara.gunathu...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> Woden depends on XmlSchema and Axiom, so changes of above two projects >>>> are important to us. I think the same matter is common for many WS sub >>>> projects. If we all in a single dev list it's much more easy to have >>>> common discussions. Only drawback is this will increase the traffic >>>> on common lists but this seems not a big issue to me. >>>> >>>> +1 for merging dev and user lists. >>>> >>>> Thanks ! >>>> >>>> On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 5:10 PM, Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I'd like to make a proposal that I think would the WS community and would >>>>> like >>>>> peoples thoughts on the matter: >>>>> >>>>> I think it would be good for the community to combine all the *-...@ws >>>>> mailing >>>>> lists (and likely general@ as well) in to a single d...@ws.apache.org. >>>>> Likewise, combine all the *-u...@ws lists into a single us...@. >>>>> Probably a >>>>> single commits list as well. >>>>> >>>>> I really think having separate lists has caused the community to fracture >>>>> into >>>>> small little eco systems with very little knowledge of what is happening >>>>> in >>>>> the rest of the community propogating from project to project. Doing >>>>> releases >>>>> is hard as the other PMC members may not be following the other projects >>>>> at >>>>> all. By combining them back into a few, broader lists, that should make >>>>> it >>>>> easier to follow what the entire community is doing. Once everyone >>>>> really >>>>> gets a feel for things and are communicating with each other, I think it >>>>> will >>>>> be easier to figure out what can/should be spun off, retired to attic, >>>>> etc... >>>>> >>>>> Also, I'd like the new lists changed to be moderated lists. Moderated >>>>> lists >>>>> are much easer for new people to get involved in, especially through >>>>> places >>>>> like nabble. >>>>> >>>>> Thoughts? >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Daniel Kulp >>>>> dk...@apache.org >>>>> http://dankulp.com/blog >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Sagara Gunathunga >>>> >>>> Blog - http://ssagara.blogspot.com >>>> Web - http://people.apache.org/~sagara/ >>>> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Sagara Gunathunga >> >> Blog - http://ssagara.blogspot.com >> Web - http://people.apache.org/~sagara/ >> > -- Sagara Gunathunga Blog - http://ssagara.blogspot.com Web - http://people.apache.org/~sagara/
