To followup some more, according to infra and suc, the following mailing
lists are still "active":
"ws-private"
"ws-announce"
"ws-axis-user-ja"
"ws-axis-cvs"
"ws-axis-tck"
"ws-commons-dev"
"ws-general"
"ws-jaxme-dev
"ws-kandula-dev"
"ws-muse-dev"
"ws-muse-user"
"ws-muse-commits"
"ws-rampart-dev"
"ws-rampart-c-dev"
"ws-sandesha-dev"
"ws-savan-dev"
"ws-woden-dev"
"ws-wsif-dev"
"ws-wsif-user"
"ws-wss4j-dev"
"ws-xmlrpc-auto"
"ws-xmlrpc-dev
From that list, I think we also need to instruct infra to close down:
"ws-axis-user-ja"
"ws-axis-cvs"
"ws-kandula-dev"
"ws-rampart-dev"
"ws-rampart-c-dev"
"ws-sandesha-dev"
"ws-savan-dev"
as those should already have been moved/merged into the Axis TLP.
These should be shutdown as the projects are "attic" material:
"ws-muse-dev"
"ws-muse-user"
"ws-muse-commits"
"ws-wsif-dev"
"ws-wsif-user"
This should probably be moved over to the Axis TLP:
"ws-axis-tck"
That leaves just:
"ws-announce"
Should that one remain or just merge that into us...@ws?
On Sunday 17 October 2010 11:01:09 pm Glen Daniels wrote:
> +1 to these changes, and thanks for pushing this forward, Dan. I added
> myself as a requested moderator on the issue.
>
> Especially since everything is going to be combined, I'd probably suggest
> we set up commits@ to cut down a bit on traffic. But IMO, Hudson
> notifications should go to dev@ so that build breaks are less likely to
> fall through the cracks.
>
> --Glen
>
> On 10/15/2010 10:35 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
> > I've filed:
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-3073
> >
> >
> > Couple things I think still need discussing:
> >
> > 1) Do we want additional lists for commits and/or issues (JIRA notices)
> > or do we want said emails to just go to the dev list?
> >
> > 2) Do we want a notification list for Hudson notifications or just to
> > the dev list?
> >
> > 3) Moderators - I signed up to be a moderator, but ideally there should
> > be a couple more. Volunteers? It's really not much work or many spam
> > messages to deal with. I have maybe 10 a day total between all the
> > CXF, Santuario, Stonehenge, and a few other lists.
> >
> > Dan
> >
> > On Thursday 14 October 2010 10:20:36 am Daniel Kulp wrote:
> >> Everyone seems fairly possitive about making this change. If no one
> >> objects by tomorrow, I'll file a INFRA issue to go ahead and do this.
> >>
> >> For dev@, it would be merging:
> >> general
> >> commons-dev
> >> xmlrpc-dev
> >> woden-dev
> >> wss4j-dev
> >> jaxme-dev
> >>
> >> users@ would, at this point, just be
> >> xmlrpc-user
> >>
> >> I THINK all the other lists at:
> >> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/#ws
> >> are either already moved on to other TLP's (juddi/axis) or retired to
> >> the attic. Can someone double check that? I'm not familliar with
> >> all the names for the various Axis modules that would have been merged
> >> already and such so I'd like to be sure about it.
> >>
> >> Thanks!
> >> Dan
> >>
> >> On Tuesday 12 October 2010 5:10:29 pm Daniel Kulp wrote:
> >>> I'd like to make a proposal that I think would the WS community and
> >>> would like peoples thoughts on the matter:
> >>>
> >>> I think it would be good for the community to combine all the *-...@ws
> >>> mailing lists (and likely general@ as well) in to a single
> >>> d...@ws.apache.org. Likewise, combine all the *-u...@ws lists into a
> >>> single us...@. Probably a single commits list as well.
> >>>
> >>> I really think having separate lists has caused the community to
> >>> fracture into small little eco systems with very little knowledge of
> >>> what is happening in the rest of the community propogating from
> >>> project to project. Doing releases is hard as the other PMC members
> >>> may not be following the other projects at all. By combining them
> >>> back into a few, broader lists, that should make it easier to follow
> >>> what the entire community is doing. Once everyone really gets a
> >>> feel for things and are communicating with each other, I think it will
> >>> be easier to figure out what can/should be spun off, retired to attic,
> >>> etc...
> >>>
> >>> Also, I'd like the new lists changed to be moderated lists. Moderated
> >>> lists are much easer for new people to get involved in, especially
> >>> through places like nabble.
> >>>
> >>> Thoughts?
--
Daniel Kulp
dk...@apache.org
http://dankulp.com/blog
