I'm happy with the substance and with construing the votes to be in
reference to substance. BTW, I did not vote as I am not a committer.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Ted Leung wrote:
> >As far as I'm concerned the vote should be on substantive content.
> >If there are presentation bugs which don't change the meaning of the
> >content, then we should allow those to be fixed without a veto.
>
> I agree. James Melton: does your submission of a revised version
> indicate that you also agree?
>
____________________________________________________________
James Melton CyLogix
609.750.5190 609.750.5100
[EMAIL PROTECTED] www.cylogix.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
In case of troubles, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
