Jakub Moc wrote: [Wed Jul 12 2006, 05:11:01PM EDT] > Uh... Sorry but it's pretty hard to imagine something more annoying > than an ebuild that dies after a couple of hours compile just > because upstream decided to rename Changelog.txt to ChangeLog.txt > and noone noticed during version bump, or because someone made > a typo there. Fail to see any benefit from this... :S Ditto for > manpages.
The point is to catch the problems at version-bump time or typo-time rather than put a broken ebuild into portage. IMHO this change can mean nothing but goodness for the overall quality of the portage tree. Surely you don't go around version-bumping and typo-ing without testing prior to commit, right? Regards, Aron
pgp9OVi53Gv5D.pgp
Description: PGP signature
