Stephen Bennett napsal(a): > On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 18:18:26 +0100 > Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Sure I did... Could you tell me why should we accumulate broken and >> vulnerable junk in the tree for years? (Outdated ebuild A depends on >> junky outdated ebuild B which depends on crappy, unsupported ebuilds >> C, D and E which... ) > > To avoid breaking the dep tree for users. Quite simple really.
Ah. That's apparently much more important than not breaking users by providing them w/ non-vulnerable, decently uptodate stuff that's not ridden by tons of bugs. Yup. :P -- Best regards, Jakub Moc mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG signature: http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95 B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3D9E ... still no signature ;)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
