Ciaran McCreesh napsal(a): > On Sat, 05 May 2007 22:19:27 +0200 > Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Ciaran McCreesh napsal(a): >>> On Sat, 5 May 2007 22:00:27 +0200 >>> Wernfried Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>>> Paludis users do see the need for a news item. >>>> Not the question if paludis users see the need. Not even the >>>> question if i see the need. The point is that GLEP 42 doesn't. >>> GLEP 42 is designed to deliver important information to users that >>> need to see it. This is exactly what's being requested here. >> OK, is this the 'how stupid this thread can become' contest? > > No, it's about delivering the best experience we can to end users. If > you're wanting to find a thread to stupidify, pick a different one.
Erm, not really? This is about proper usage of GLEP42 stuff. If you want to improve user experience in other ways, file another GLEP for that, instead of misusing critical news porting for is. There's nothing critical about your * stuff. -- Best regards, Jakub Moc mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG signature: http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95 B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3D9E ... still no signature ;)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
